home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=93TT0167>
- <title>
- Aug. 09, 1993: Right-Wing P.C. Is Still P.C.
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1993
- Aug. 09, 1993 Lost Secrets Of The Maya
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- ESSAY, Page 66
- Right-Wing P.C. Is Still P.C.
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>By Michael Kinsley
- </p>
- <p> Political fashions drift from left to right. The enthusiastic
- sectarian style of American communists during the 1930s and
- 1940s traveled with the neoconservatives when they washed ashore
- as immigrants to the land of conservatism during the 1970s and
- 1980s. The rallying cry of race-blind equal opportunity, which
- was of little interest to right-wingers during the heyday of
- the civil rights movement, was later taken as the right's own
- in the struggle over affirmative action. And now, having spent
- recent years diagnosing a virus of democracy they label "political
- correctness," some conservatives seem to be succumbing themselves.
- </p>
- <p> What exactly is p.c.? By now it has degenerated into an all-purpose
- term of political abuse that means little more than "a view
- I disagree with." But it is meant to suggest a stifling orthodoxy,
- an intolerance of opposing views that verges on censorship,
- victimization chic and a stagy oversensitivity to robust remarks.
- All these elements have lately surfaced on the right, most noticeably
- in controversies over Clinton Administration nominees.
- </p>
- <p> Attacks on alleged political correctness are themselves often
- attempts to narrow the range of permissible debate and embrace
- the chic of victimization. In a May commencement speech about
- the new intolerance, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas complained
- that "a new brand of stereotypes and ad hominem assaults are
- surfacing across the nation's college campuses, in the national
- media, in Hollywood and among the...`cultural elite' " aimed
- at "those who dare to disagree with the latest ideological fad."
- If anyone has ever actually prevented Thomas from expressing
- his views, I would like to hear of it. Vigorous dissent is not
- censorship.
- </p>
- <p> In his speech Thomas asserted remarkably, "One of the things
- I looked forward to when I first went to Washington was the
- opportunity to debate and discuss difficult issues with those
- who had competing ideas," but no one was interested. He cannot
- have tried very hard. This assertion lends special poignance
- to Thomas' confirmation testimony that he had never debated
- Roe v. Wade.
- </p>
- <p> Meanwhile Sheldon Hackney, former president of the University
- of Pennsylvania and President Clinton's nominee for chairman
- of the National Endowment for the Humanities, was savaged for
- saying, after black students seized and threw away copies of
- a campus newspaper with an offending column, "Two important
- university values, diversity and open expression, seem to be
- in conflict." In fact, Hackney's statement also referred to
- "the overriding importance of freedom of expression," about
- which "there can be no compromise." (And the students involved
- face university punishment for their actions.) But merely for
- suggesting that the feelings of minority students are a concern
- at all in a diverse academic community, Hackney violated the
- rules of right-wing political correctness. He didn't get the
- mantra exactly right.
- </p>
- <p> Feelings are what Dr. Joycelyn Elders, Clinton's nominee for
- Surgeon General, stands accused of hurting with her controversial
- remarks about antiabortion activists (they have a "love affair
- with the fetus," and so on). Elders is, as TIME put it, "a verbal
- bomb thrower." The sensitivities of Roman Catholics and Fundamentalist
- Protestants were said to have been offended by her tart tongue.
- No doubt she wishes that she had bitten her tongue on an occasion
- or two. If that is not promotion of a stifling orthodoxy, what
- is?
- </p>
- <p> The case of Lani Guinier is slightly different. Her writings,
- far from being overly vivid, were downright obtuse. But in them
- she presented some novel ideas for minority representation in
- a democracy. When Clinton killed her nomination for head of
- the Justice Department's civil rights division, Guinier warned
- against "a new intellectual orthodoxy, in which thoughtful people
- can no longer debate provocative ideas without denying the country
- their talents as public servants."
- </p>
- <p> This echoes Robert Bork's complaint in 1987 that his rejection
- by the Senate would cause potential Supreme Court nominees to
- avoid leaving a paper trail. But there is a key difference.
- President Reagan chose Bork precisely because of his paper trail
- of radical views. President Clinton chose Guinier as an experienced
- civil rights litigator. There was no danger the tentative academic
- musings in Guinier's writings would become locked into policy,
- even if she had wanted them to. Guinier was doomed for her thinking,
- not for anything she might actually have done in the job--a classic p.c. exercise.
- </p>
- <p> The reductio ad absurdum of right-wing p.c. may be the opposition
- to Tara J. O'Toole, Clinton's nominee for Assistant Secretary
- of Energy. O'Toole's nomination has been held up by two Republican
- Senators because--and follow this closely, please--she belongs
- to a study group that once had the name Marxist Feminist Group.
- The group, which meets about three times a year, changed its
- name to Northeast Feminist Scholars years before O'Toole joined
- it. The Administration wrote the Senate that O'Toole "has never
- endorsed Marxist theory, nor has she ever had the impression
- that any other members of N.F.S. held such a belief." Why the
- political beliefs of other members of a three-times-a-year discussion
- group attended by an Energy Department official are any of the
- Senate's business is certainly a mystery.
- </p>
- <p> There are legitimate, bothersome examples of p.c. intolerance
- on both sides of the political spectrum. But when you start
- getting into guilt by association, you are beyond conventional
- p.c. of the left or right and back into the more virulent form
- of right-wing p.c. known as McCarthyism.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-